Many myths and stereotypical misconceptions blight the recruitment industry. Here Sam Davies sets the record straight on four.
Newsletter
DiversityQ supports board members setting and enacting their D&I strategy, HR directors managing their departments to take D&I best practice and implement it in real-life workplace situations
Most
companies have used a recruitment agency at some point, whether they’re looking
for a quick and efficient hire or the next executive manager, getting someone
else to do the recruiting for you can seem like the easiest way to go.
But,
what if recruiting through an agency meant you were missing out on some of the
best candidates? I’ve taken a look at the most common myths of how recruitment
agencies find the best talent, with a specific focus on how this could
negatively impact more diverse candidates and how we can overcome these stereotypical
recruitment myths.
Myth #1: Recruiters have a wider choice
in candidates
Whilst
recruitment agencies have a wide choice of candidates who are eager to work,
the harsh reality is that only a few of them might have the relevant experience
for the job you need them to do. Recruitment agencies traditionally meet all of
their candidates, and although this gives them a better understanding of the
individual, it also means they could be more susceptible to unconscious
bias towards more diverse candidates based on age, race or even sex.
Using
your current employees’ connections, means that you can tap into just as many
candidates as a recruitment agency with the added bonus of also receiving an
employee endorsement. This means that your pool of candidates becomes a pool of
potentially 1000s that are already trusted contacts.
Myth #2: You can find staff quicker
through a recruitment agency
When
you need a new member of staff as soon as possible, a recruitment agency can
seem like the quickest solution to finding someone, due to the sheer amount of
candidates they’ll have on their system. If you’re in a hurry to find an
employee, the process can be fairly short.
This
process might be quick but it may prove expensive if there’s need for it to be
repeated often. We’ve found that retention rates for employee referrals are
actually 39% better than other methods of recruitment.
Additionally,
it’s not always quick and the recruitment agency could take months to find and
hire the right candidate. Using an automated referral platform has the
potential to speed up the hiring processes as candidates found via employee
referrals are three-to-four times more likely to be hired, significantly
cutting down the time required to find your perfect new member of staff.
Myth #3: Agencies will find the most
suitable candidate for your company
Agencies
have access to a lot of candidates, but that doesn’t always mean they will
always have the right candidate. Diversifying your recruiting strategies can
help you find better candidates, but it also means that more diverse candidates
stand more of a chance of being given an opportunity.
Using
an employee referral system means that public profiles on networks such as
LinkedIn, enriched with other publicly available data can be utilised to ensure
that candidates have precisely the correct skillset for the role being
advertised – without revealing any personal information.
Myth #4: Using an agency means using
fair recruitment
Due
to the diverse range of candidates that a recruitment agency has, you would
assume this means fair recruitment but unfortunately this isn’t always the
case. There can always be unconscious bias in agency recruitment.
Although recruitment agencies will do all they can to minimise any potential prejudice, having a selection process that’s initial stages are based around using staff to paper-sift applicants means there will inevitably be some form of bias.
Using
blind recruitment rather than the approach taken by agencies can help to
eliminate any unconscious bias surrounding race/ethnicity, age, headshots or
even names. This can help to ensure that candidates are only picked for the
skills that they have rather than any other traits.
So, whilst recruitment agencies can be a great way of finding staff quickly, there are better ways to make sure you find the best candidate for your company, as well as a means of giving more diverse candidates a chance.
4 myth-busting facts about how recruitment agencies find the best talent
Many myths and stereotypical misconceptions blight the recruitment industry. Here Sam Davies sets the record straight on four.
Newsletter
DiversityQ supports board members setting and enacting their D&I strategy, HR directors managing their departments to take D&I best practice and implement it in real-life workplace situations
Sign up nowMost companies have used a recruitment agency at some point, whether they’re looking for a quick and efficient hire or the next executive manager, getting someone else to do the recruiting for you can seem like the easiest way to go.
But, what if recruiting through an agency meant you were missing out on some of the best candidates? I’ve taken a look at the most common myths of how recruitment agencies find the best talent, with a specific focus on how this could negatively impact more diverse candidates and how we can overcome these stereotypical recruitment myths.
Myth #1: Recruiters have a wider choice in candidates
Whilst recruitment agencies have a wide choice of candidates who are eager to work, the harsh reality is that only a few of them might have the relevant experience for the job you need them to do. Recruitment agencies traditionally meet all of their candidates, and although this gives them a better understanding of the individual, it also means they could be more susceptible to unconscious bias towards more diverse candidates based on age, race or even sex.
Using your current employees’ connections, means that you can tap into just as many candidates as a recruitment agency with the added bonus of also receiving an employee endorsement. This means that your pool of candidates becomes a pool of potentially 1000s that are already trusted contacts.
Around 80% of recruiters say the best channel to recruit quality candidates is employee referrals. This is because they usually take less time to hire, are a better cultural fit, better performers and stay longer.
Myth #2: You can find staff quicker through a recruitment agency
When you need a new member of staff as soon as possible, a recruitment agency can seem like the quickest solution to finding someone, due to the sheer amount of candidates they’ll have on their system. If you’re in a hurry to find an employee, the process can be fairly short.
This process might be quick but it may prove expensive if there’s need for it to be repeated often. We’ve found that retention rates for employee referrals are actually 39% better than other methods of recruitment.
Additionally, it’s not always quick and the recruitment agency could take months to find and hire the right candidate. Using an automated referral platform has the potential to speed up the hiring processes as candidates found via employee referrals are three-to-four times more likely to be hired, significantly cutting down the time required to find your perfect new member of staff.
Myth #3: Agencies will find the most suitable candidate for your company
Agencies have access to a lot of candidates, but that doesn’t always mean they will always have the right candidate. Diversifying your recruiting strategies can help you find better candidates, but it also means that more diverse candidates stand more of a chance of being given an opportunity.
Using an employee referral system means that public profiles on networks such as LinkedIn, enriched with other publicly available data can be utilised to ensure that candidates have precisely the correct skillset for the role being advertised – without revealing any personal information.
Myth #4: Using an agency means using fair recruitment
Due to the diverse range of candidates that a recruitment agency has, you would assume this means fair recruitment but unfortunately this isn’t always the case. There can always be unconscious bias in agency recruitment.
Although recruitment agencies will do all they can to minimise any potential prejudice, having a selection process that’s initial stages are based around using staff to paper-sift applicants means there will inevitably be some form of bias.
Using blind recruitment rather than the approach taken by agencies can help to eliminate any unconscious bias surrounding race/ethnicity, age, headshots or even names. This can help to ensure that candidates are only picked for the skills that they have rather than any other traits.
So, whilst recruitment agencies can be a great way of finding staff quickly, there are better ways to make sure you find the best candidate for your company, as well as a means of giving more diverse candidates a chance.
>See also: Diversity recruitment strategies
Sam Davies
Sam Davies is the CEO and founder of Real Links More by Sam Davies
Latest
Samsung UK: women should not allow self-doubt to hinder their careers
TechSmith transforms meeting for enhanced collaboration, equity
Crafting a comprehensive benefits literacy plan for your employees
Related
Crafting a comprehensive benefits literacy plan for your employees
Benefits literacy is essential for employees to maximise their wellbeing
The urgent need for equity and inclusion in a divided society
Dr don Trahan Jr. combats anti-DEI movements and pioneers change through Global Equity Entertainment
Women against women: the hidden obstacle in Corporate America
Reflections on the betrayal and hostility from fellow women in the workplace
Benchmarking progress toward digital accessibility
Organisations are failing in their duty to make online activity accessible to all